University Accreditation (UA) supports the ongoing process of collecting and analyzing data and implementing data-informed decisions as related to the goals and outcomes of the UNT mission. UA manages the Improve database (formerly known as TracDat) for institutional effectiveness (IE) plans, and reports institutional effectiveness to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC).
An online, self-service training course is available on UNT Bridge: Institutional Effectiveness Reporting Guidelines. This training is available for those responsible for IE planning for academic programs, student support services, and administrative areas.
The Institutional Effectiveness process is focused on improving UNT's student learning outcomes and services, while increasing student success and institutional quality. Not only is it the right thing to do for our students and UNT, but including continuous improvement and innovation as part of the institutional culture ensures that student success and achievement are at the forefront of our mission.
UNT has built Institutional Effectiveness plans using Improve for all degrees and graduate certificates; as well as administrative, academic and student support, research and public service units. In addition, UNT assesses the student learning outcomes of general education courses (core curriculum classes) in Improve. All of these plans align with SACSCOC Core Requirements 7.1, 7.3, 8.1 and 8.2 which state:
Effective institutions demonstrate a commitment to the principles of continuous improvement. These principles are based on a systematic and documented process of assessing institutional performance with respect to mission in all aspects of the institution. An institutional planning and effectiveness process involves all programs, services and constituencies; is linked to the decision-making process at all levels; and provides a sound basis for budgetary decisions and resource allocations.
7.1.The institution engages in ongoing, comprehensive, and integrated research-based planning and evaluation processes that (a) focus on institutional quality and effectiveness and (b) incorporate a systematic review of institutional goals and outcomes consistent with its mission. (Institutional Planning) [CR]
7.3.The institution identifies expected outcomes of its administrative support services and demonstrates the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. (Administrative effectiveness)
8.1. The institution identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution's mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs offered. The institution uses multiple measures to document student success. (Student achievement) [CR]
8.2. The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of seeking improvement based on analysis of the results in the areas below:
a. Student learning outcomes for each of its educational programs. (Student outcomes: educational programs)
b. Student learning outcomes for collegiate-level general education competencies of its undergraduate degree programs. (Student outcomes: general education)
c. Academic and student services that support student success. (Student outcomes: academic and student services)
-- SACSCOC The Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement
In 2008, UNT adopted TracDat as the university-wide database for the collection and storage of academic and administrative institutional effectiveness plans. In 2018, the vendor changed the name of the system to Improve. Only minor changes occurred with the name change. University Accreditation (UA) oversees the administration of the database. UNT's Strategic Plan goals, program objectives and copies of assessments, results and future plans are stored in the database, allowing for outcomes to be tracked across time. Each assessment plan is reviewed and critiqued annually, in accordance with UNT's Institutional Effectiveness Plan.
In addition to the UA office, UNT utilizes peer-review committees to evaluate IE plans. These committees score plans according to a rubric; provide feedback; and meet with those needing support. University Accreditation is thankful for these voluntary members' service and dedication to UNT's Institutional Effectiveness Plan:
UNT Institutional Effectiveness Timeline*
*Inquiries about timelines for Core assessment data should be directed to improve@unt.edu.
This timeline is only for IE purposes, and not for Core assessment.
Academic Year (AY) 2021-22: Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Summer 2022 |
|
October 15, 2022 |
|
November 2022 - June 2023 |
|
Academic Year 2022-23 IE Plans Due: October 15, 2023 Academic Year 2022-23: Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Summer 2023 |
|
The UA office is always available to support Improve users with their IE plans. In additional to one-on-one support, the office has provided some tools assist with institutional effectiveness efforts. Please contact the UA office if you have any questions.
Frequently Asked Questions on UNT's Institutional Effectiveness Process for Administrative Units
This is UNT's program of institutional effectiveness. |
|
Improve and Institutional Effectiveness Guidelines
|
This is a copy of the training presentation for new Improve users. |
A guide to completing year-end reporting expectations due in October each year. |
|
|
This is a copy of the rubric used by the peer-review committees to score IE plans for feedback to IE plan owners. |
How to hide inactive/complete outcomes
|
Improve users can hide (filter) their inactive assessment methods and completed outcomes to simplify the work with active outcomes. Users are asked to never delete inactive or completed outcomes. |
How to reveal hidden inactive/complete outcomes
|
Improve users can follow these steps to reveal inactive or completed outcomes that are filtered. |
Improve instructions for assessing the Core
|
Reporting assessment for the Core is a separate process that also uses Improve. Follow these instructions for building assessment methods and reporting results for the Core. |